26 May 2010 @ 12:29 AM 

Asus P320 is not just a fashionable phone when it is once to be when it was launched. Recently, this phone is able to run Windows Mobile 6.5 with improved performance compared to Windows Mobile 6.1 which come from stock. However, Windows Mobile as we all learned, is not what I think a good OS. The question is whether Asus P320 like other Windows Mobile powered phone able to port to Linux?

Here are some facts on the hardware for Asus P320.

Asus P320 Mini GPS PDA Phone

The exceptionally elegant Asus P320 Mini GPS PDA phone was designed for the fashion-conscious who are constantly admired for their accessories – including their handheld choices. The P320’s presents an ultra compact form that makes it feel almost weightless in a ladys palm. Its fashionable outlook is slim and slender, and is molded with round curves that are aesthetically pleasing to the eye. And yet, this beauty is not just skin deep, as a wide range of features make it equally powerful and intelligent – all packed in neatly with an original and exclusive interface developed by ASUS.

ARM Processor: ARM926EJ-S

Silicon Supplier: Texas Instruments OMAP 850

Source: http://www.arm.com/markets/mobile/asus-p320-mini-gps-pda-phone.php

About ARM926EJ-S Processor

The ARM926EJ-S™ processor features a Jazelle® technology enhanced 32-bit RISC CPU, flexible size instruction and data caches, tightly coupled memory (TCM) interfaces and memory management unit (MMU). It also provides separate instruction and data AMBA® AHB™interfaces suitable for Multi-layer AHB based systems. The ARM926EJ-S processor implements the ARMv5TEJ instruction set which includes an enhanced 16 x 32-bit multiplier capable of single cycle MAC operations and 16-bit fixed point DSP instructions to enhance performance of many signal processing applications as well as supporting Thumb® technology.

A hard macro implementation of the ARM926EJ processor is available from the ARM Processor Foundry Program and from the DesignStart Program.

Why ARM926?

A powerful application processor for platform OS based applications

The ARM926EJ-S processor is the entry point processor capable of supporting a full Operating System such as LinuxWindows CE, and Symbian. An ideal choice for many applications, the ARM926EJ-S processor is one of the most popular ARM processors.

Some of the features offered by the ARM926EJ-S processor are:

  • Java acceleration
  • DSP extensions
  • Optional floating point unit
  • Flexible local memory system with cache and exceptional Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) integration
  • Binary compatibility with the ARM7TDMI® processor

Industry standard

Over 5 Billion ARM9 processors have been shipped so far

The ARM926EJ-S processor has been licensed by over 100 silicon vendors worldwide, and continues to be successfully deployed across a wide range of products and applications.

By offering stable and proven performance, it provides designers a low risk solution, with very fast time to market.

Platform OS support

The ARM926EJ-S processor features an MMU, allowing for the use of fully featured OS such as LinuxWindows CE, andSymbian.

Accelerated Java Performance

  • Jazelle® DBX is widely used to deliver very high performance Java in mobile handsets and other consumer devices without impacting memory consumption, battery life or user experience.
  • Jazelle RCT can be used to significantly reduce the code bloat associated with AOT and JIT compilation, making AOT technology viable on mass-market devices.
  • Additionally Jazelle RCT can also be used to support execution environments beyond Java, such as Microsoft .NET Compact Framework, Python and others.

Flexible

Customizable for feature-rich and cost-sensitive applications

  • Configurable Memory Management Unit
  • Highly configurable cache & TCM plus bus interface
  • Flexible debug and trace infrastructure
  • Optional Floating Point Unit (IEE754)

Rich ecosystem of OS, RTOS, and tools support

Over 650 members in the Connected Community supporting ARM926EJ-S processors

  • Broadest ecosystem of compilers, debuggers and RTOS tools in the industry
  • Plentiful design services partners to aid in design task
  • Large variety of third party IP available to integrate with processors

Source: http://www.arm.com/products/processors/classic/arm9/arm926.php

Conclusion: Develop Linux OS to run in Asus P320 is possible but yet to become reality.

Posted By: Aeric
Last Edit: 26 May 2010 @ 12:29 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
 19 May 2010 @ 9:46 PM 

如何勾引白羊座男人
沖動好勝的白羊男人,是超級感官的雄性動物。迷人的曲線、魅惑的神采,所有女性化的象征都是勾引他的最佳良方嗹嘐嘛嘝,如果你夠大膽,擦上艷麗的口紅瞀瞉睼瞁,足登高跟鞋,蓮步走來嫢孷孵寞,飄散著迷人的香氣,胸口還若隱若現可見小山溝暟暨暢暡,包准他馬上生理征服心理,以行動向你靠近。
如何勾引金牛座男人
誠懇踏實如同阿信般的女子是他的最愛,喜歡一切女性溫柔的特質,對他而言,太骨感的女人不好抱;太嬌的女人侍奉不起;不能同甘苦共患難者免談,要想勾引金牛男子,一切從胃開始,能煮一桌好菜的你,令他作夢也想你想到笑!
如何勾引雙子座男人
雙子男人心思多變,今天覺得玉女式長發很飄逸,明天又覺得短發俏麗又可愛,太過癡情會嚇死他,楚楚可憐令他倒胃,以言語勾引他為最最上策,淺笑把酒間,以幽默感和同理心激起他的共鳴,只要讓他覺得和你說話很有趣,你就老神在在等他上門吧。
如何勾引巨蟹座男人
內心柔軟的巨蟹男子,最渴望有人細心的灌溉他心中那顆小樹苗,勾引重點在於-先若無其事的接近他,在不定時送些早餐、貼些小紙條在他桌上,提醒他吃飯、吃維他命、不要著涼,別怕他嫌啰唆,當他為你的心思所感動時,會以無比的耐心來追求你,使你成為他一生的伴侶。
如何勾引獅子座男人
強悍的獅子男人,征服女人對他而言簡直是輕而易舉,比喝白開水還簡單,但如果你有意挑釁又愛強辦,口才比他好一點,姿態比他高一點,氣焰比他更囂張一點,哪可真是會令他火冒三丈,想要在情感上或床上征服你,這樣的贏法才是最棒的,聰明如你,快快練習高傲的姿態吧
如何勾引處女座男人
處女男子要勾不容易,因為他會看小地方,而且異常聰明的他,十分清楚你在玩什麼把戲,唯一上上策就是以耐心取勝,隨時表達你對他的密切關注,對於他感興趣的事絕不能向小白癡一樣一無所知,也許你會覺得這樣的勾引方式太累,但到手之後他可是忠心耿耿,絕對值回代價!-如何勾引天秤座情人
如何勾引天秤座男人
天性優雅的天秤男子,對於具又藝術氣質的女人永遠無法抗拒,建議你沒事談談歌劇聊聊文學,電影美學也要略知一二,身上的衣服就算不是香奈兒也要干干淨淨,讓他看到一個怡人的你,覺得帶你出去會很又面子,他就會卯足勁來粘你啦。
如何勾引天蠍座男人
天蠍男子看來冷靜,其實對於甜美的女人情有獨钟,就算你沒有梅格萊恩般的笑窩,也要常心情保持開朗,一副純真又窩心的俏模樣,最重要的是,不能常常去找他,只要勾他一下,消失兩下,讓他心癢難耐,一段時間之後,你就可以像抓甕中之虌一樣,只要等待他爬上門來就大功告成。
如何勾引射手座男人
樂觀一派的射手男子,對於憂傷的事特別沒興趣,所以如果你一副苦心蓮的模樣,他會給你5塊錢但是不會愛你,建議你還是開心過日子,准備好一堆笑話,讓他在笑聲中發現你的好,接下來他的火熱行動可是會嚇死人的喔!
如何勾引摩羯座男人
摩羯男人又現實又愛錢,花枝招展他嫌俗氣,一身名牌他會想–娶了你還得了,要想勾引他,樸實大方是第一原則,勤儉持家是他的最愛,用共同打拼未來做誘餌,讓他明白雖然他的人生有很多夢想,但你可以陪他築夢踏實,這樣的人生良伴,他一定不會輕易放你走。
如何勾引水瓶座男人
水瓶男子的難抓舉世聞名,可能這一分钟他想與你纏綿,下一秒钟他又想擁有獨處的空間,獨立自主的女人最令他心生向往,表現你的堅強,展現你的不在乎和灑脫,如果你比他更愛孤獨,他就會愛你勝過他自己。
如何勾引雙魚座男人
愛好浪漫的雙魚座,不管他是一絲不苟的上班族還是幾家公司的大老板,在他內心深處都有一個小男孩,渴望你呵護嬰兒般呵護他,故意露出你善於照顧人的一面,看到流浪狗會掉眼淚的女人,最能勾起他的追求欲望。
Source: [星座] 如何引誘十二星座男人 伊莉討論區

Posted By: Aeric
Last Edit: 19 May 2010 @ 09:54 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
 17 May 2010 @ 11:51 PM 

Aeric: Food for thought. I received this from a forwarded email from a friend of mine.

May 2, 2010

www.freemalaysiatoday.com

Thuan Chye Responds to “Orang Cina Malaysia, apa lagi yang anda mahu?”(Utusan Malaysia article)

By Kee Thuan Chye

COMMENT Every time the Barisan Nasional gets less than the expected support from Chinese voters at an election, the question invariably pops up among the petty-minded: Why are the Chinese ungrateful? So now, after the Hulu Selangor by-election, it’s not surprising to read in Utusan Malaysia a piece that asks: “Orang Cina Malaysia, apa lagi yang anda mahu?” (Chinese of Malaysia, what more do you want?)

Normally, something intentionally provocative and propagandistic as this doesn’t deserve to be honoured with a reply. But even though I’m fed up of such disruptive and ethnocentric polemics, this time I feel obliged to reply – partly because the article has also been published, in an English translation, in the Straits Times of Singapore.

I wish to emphasise here that I am replying not as a Chinese Malaysian but, simply, as a Malaysian. Let me say at the outset that the Chinese have got nothing more than what any citizen should get. So to ask “what more” it is they want, is misguided. A correct question would be “What do the Chinese want?”

All our lives, we Chinese have held to the belief that no one owes us a living. We have to work for it. Most of us have got where we are by the sweat of our brow, not by handouts or the policies of the government.

We have come to expect nothing – not awards, not accolades, not gifts from official sources. (Let’s not lump in Datukships, that’s a different ball game.) We know that no Chinese who writes in the Chinese language will ever be bestowed the title of Sasterawan Negara, unlike in Singapore where the literatures of all the main language streams are recognised and honoured with the Cultural Medallion, etc.

We have learned we can’t expect the government to grant us scholarships. Some will get those, but countless others won’t. We’ve learned to live with that and to work extra hard in order to support our children to attain higher education – because education is very important to us. We experience a lot of daily pressure to achieve that. Unfortunately, not many non-Chinese realise or understand that. In fact, many Chinese had no choice but to emigrate for the sake of their children’s further education. Or to accept scholarships from abroad, many from Singapore, which has inevitably led to a brain drain.

The writer of the Utusan article says the Chinese “account for most of the students” enrolled in “the best private colleges in Malaysia”. Even so, the Chinese still have to pay a lot of money to have their children study in these colleges. And to earn that money, the parents have to work very hard. The money does not fall from the sky.

The writer goes on to add: “The Malays can gain admission into only government-owned colleges of ordinary reputation.” That is utter nonsense. Some of these colleges are meant for the cream of the Malay crop of students and are endowed with the best facilities. They are given elite treatment.

The writer also fails to acknowledge that the Chinese are barred from being admitted to some of these colleges. As a result, the Chinese are forced to pay more money to go to private colleges. Furthermore, the Malays are also welcome to enrol in the private colleges, and many of them do. It’s, after all, a free enterprise.

Plain and simple reason

The writer claims that the Chinese live “in the lap of luxury” and lead lives that are “more than ordinary” whereas the Malays in Singapore, their minority-race counterparts there, lead “ordinary lives”. Such sweeping statements sound inane especially when they are not backed up by definitions of “lap of luxury” and “ordinary lives”. They sound hysterical, if not hilarious as well, when they are not backed up by evidence. It’s surprising that a national daily like Utusan Malaysia would publish something as idiosyncratic as that. And the Straits Times too.

The writer quotes from a survey that said eight of the 10 richest people in Malaysia are Chinese. Well, if these people are where they are, it must have also come from hard work and prudent business sense. Is that something to be faulted?

If the writer had said that some of them achieved greater wealth through being given crony privileges and lucrative contracts by the government, there might be a point, but even then, it would still take hard work and business acumen to secure success. Certainly, Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary, who is one of the 10, would take exception if it were said that he has not worked hard and lacks business savvy.

Most important, it should be noted that the eight Chinese tycoons mentioned in the survey represent but a minuscule percentage of the wider Chinese Malaysian population. To extrapolate that because eight Chinese are filthy rich, the rest of the Chinese must therefore live in the lap of luxury and lead more than ordinary lives would be a mockery of the truth. The writer has obviously not met the vast numbers of very poor Chinese.

The crux of the writer’s article is that the Chinese are not grateful to the government by not voting for Barisan Nasional at the Hulu Selangor by-election. But this demonstrates the thinking of either a simple mind or a closed one.

Why did the Chinese by and large not vote for BN? Because it’s corrupt. Plain and simple. Let’s call a spade a spade. And BN showed how corrupt it was during the campaign by throwing bribes to the electorate, including promising RM3 million to the Chinese school in Rasa.

The Chinese were not alone in seeing this corruption. The figures are unofficial but one could assume that at least 40 per cent of Malays and 45 per cent of Indians who voted against BN in that by-election also had their eyes open. So, what’s wrong with not supporting a government that is corrupt? If the government is corrupt, do we continue to support it?

To answer the question then, what do the Chinese want? They want a government that is not corrupt; that can govern well and proves to have done so; that tells the truth rather than lies; that follows the rule of law; that upholds rather than abuses the country’s sacred institutions. BN does not fit that description, so the Chinese don’t vote for it. This is not what only the Chinese want. It is something every sensible Malaysian, regardless of race, wants. Is that something that is too difficult to understand?

Some people think that the government is to be equated with the country, and therefore if someone does not support the government, they are being disloyal to the country. This is a complete fallacy. BN is not Malaysia. It is merely a political coalition that is the government of the day. Rejecting BN is not rejecting the country.

A sense of belonging

Let’s be clear about this important distinction. In America, the people sometimes vote for the Democrats and sometimes for the Republicans. Voting against the one that is in government at the time is not considered disloyalty to the country.

By the same token, voting against UMNO is also voting against a party, not against a race. And if the Chinese or whoever criticise UMNO, they are criticising the party; they are not criticising Malays. It just happens that UMNO’s leaders are Malay.

It is time all Malaysians realised this so that we can once and for all dispel the confusion. Let us no more confuse country with government. We can love our country and at the same time hate the government. It is perfectly all right.

I should add here what the Chinese don’t want. We don’t want to be insulted, to be called pendatang, or told to be grateful for our citizenship. We have been loyal citizens; we duly and dutifully pay taxes; we respect the country’s constitution and its institutions. Our forefathers came to this country generations ago and helped it to prosper. We are continuing to contribute to the country’s growth and development.

Would anyone like to be disparaged, made to feel unwelcome, unwanted? For the benefit of the writer of the Utusan article, what MCA president Chua Soi Lek means when he says the MCA needs to be more vocal is that it needs to speak up whenever the Chinese community is disparaged. For too long, the MCA has not spoken up strongly enough when UMNO politicians and associates like Ahmad Ismail, Nasir Safar, Ahmad Noh and others before them insulted the Chinese and made them feel like they don’t belong. That’s why the Chinese have largely rejected the MCA.

You see, the Chinese, like all human beings, want self-respect. And a sense of belonging in this country they call home. That is all the Chinese want, and have always wanted. Nothing more.

The Utusan Malaysia article: Orang Cina Malaysia, apa lagi yang anda mahu?

Dramatist and journalist Kee Thuan Chye is the author of ‘March 8: The Day Malaysia Woke Up’. He is a contributor to Free Malaysia Today.

Posted By: Aeric
Last Edit: 17 May 2010 @ 11:51 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (1)
Tags

 Last 50 Posts
 Back
Change Theme...
  • Users » 2
  • Posts/Pages » 129
  • Comments » 195
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight